17 Dec - Members of Congress will receive a $4,700 (or 2.8%) pay raise in January, making
their salary $174,000 a year. This puts them in the top 6% of US households.

6 Jan - Vice President Dick Cheney is quoted in the LT that 'nobody knew the economic
troubles were coming'. He is quickly contradicted by the PBS Newshour which
does a story saying that Robert Shiller, Dean Baker, Martin Feldstein, and Joseph
Stiglitz, among others, warned of the troubles. Feldstein, a conservative, warned
about it two years ago.

12 Jan - So far, of the six votes listed in the Journal World, Jenkins has voted just like
Moran and the opposite of Moore. Two bills have passed on wage discrimination
with Jenkins voting against. Next weeks agenda includes SCHIP (State Childrens
Health Insurance Plan) and the other $350 billion of bailout money (or TARP).

19 Jan - Jenkins votes against increased funding for SCHIP (State Children's Health
Insurance Plan) claiming that increased funding will hurt children in poor
families. The American Association of Family Physicians is in favor of the bill,
which did pass the House. 40 Republicans voted for it, which is 23% of House
Republicans, including Jerry Moran.

19 Jan - Nancy Boyda's schedule from January 2007
            19 Jan - Topeka's 14th annual Martin Luther King celebration
            20 Jan - Retired Military Personnel meeting in Iola
                        Angel Food ministries in Iola
                        VFW meeting in Fort Scott
                        Ladies Night Out in Leavenworth
            22 Jan - Outpatient Clinic ribbon cutting in Lawrence

            Near as this reporter can tell, Jenkins only Kansas event is the opening of her
            Pittsburg office next week.

27 Jan - Republicans complaining about the Democratic stimulus plan, that it involves too
            much 'pork'. They want more and bigger tax cuts, and also want to eliminate tax
            cuts for lower income working people. They claim we lower income people 'do
            not pay taxes'. While it is true that I, for example, do not pay federal income
            taxes because of my low income and because I also put over $500 in my IRA
            account. It is simply not true that I 'do not pay taxes'. Last year, for example, I
            paid $1,314 in property taxes, $1,928 in FICA taxes (are these 'taxes'? My w-2 says
            they are.) about $170 in Kansas income taxes and at least $450 in sales taxes. For
            a grand total of $3,862 on taxable income of $11,968.  This, to Brownback,
            Roberts and Jenkins is 'paying no taxes' and they would oppose a tax plan that
            gives every working American a $500 tax credit in favor of a plan that gives tax
            breaks to people with higher incomes. Compassionate conservatism strikes
            again.  This from Congresspeople who got a $4,700 raise this year and make more             money than 90% of American households.

28 Jan - Obama stimulus plan passes the House without a single Republican vote.
             Jenkins voted against it and voted for all three Republican amendments.  She 
             complains about pork, usings $50 million to the National Endowment for the
             Arts as an example. Yet the Bush tax cuts, that she wants to keep permanent, 
             give about $40 million to Alice Walton and huge amounts to other billionaires.
             Why object to money going to artists but support money going to billionaires?
             With just the dividend tax cuts $46.6 BILLION goes to just about 100,000
             Americans who make more than $2,000,000.
                   Further,  Economists at the CBPP say that the Obama tax cuts will create
             more stimulus than the Republican plan, and also that the Republican plan
             provides more benefits for wealthier households.

5 Feb - Senate delays the stimulus bill. The media has been pushing the Republican
           message that the bill is a spending bill, not a stimulus bill. Now the media is
           blaming Obama for not being prepared for Republican obstruction. Perhaps he
           naively thought they would put their "country first" in a time of crisis. Perhaps
           he thought the media would tell the truth instead of spreading Republican spin.
           The truth is that spending is economic stimulus. A CBO economist testified to
           Congress and was asked by a Republican Robert Aderholt of Alabama what
           percentage of the spending will stimulate the economy? Mr. Elmendorf replied
           "So I think all of the $800 billion provides some stimulative effect. The extent of
           stimulus varies by category, but it all matters, all of it."

12 Feb - Senate passes stimulus bill. Many in the media are still working against it. Brian
             Williams of NBC calls it a "so called stimulus". Congresswoman Jenkins writes
             against it on her website, saying that "spending got us into this mess."
             Presumably the mess was caused by the deficit and national debt. However, the
            debt has not been caused primarily by spending. In 1980 the national debt was
            $909 billion, by 1990 it was $3,206 billion. By 2000 it was $5,629 billion and by
            2007 it was $8,950.7. $2.3 trillion of debt was created in the 1980s and $3.3
            trillion under JR Bush.
                Did that happen because of spending increases? In real terms, spending went
            up by 35% in the 1980s and by 26.5% in the last seven years. However, spending
            went up by 57% in the 1960s and by 42% in the 1970s when the debt did not
            increase nearly as much. The trouble is on the income tax side. In the 1960s,
            income tax revenues grew by 122% and in the 1970s by 170%. That is partly due
            to inflation and partly to a growing economy.  In the 1980s, income taxes only
            grew by 91%. Revenue didn't keep up with spending because spending did not
            grow fast enough. This was due to tax cuts, most of which went to wealthier
            people. The same was true in the recent Bush terms. Income tax revenues only
            grew by 15.8% from 2000 until 2007. The economy itself grew by 26% from 2000
            until 2005 while income tax revenues went down by 7.7%.
                 We have a massive national debt today mainly because Reagan and GW Bush
            gave huge tax breaks to rich people (so did Clinton in 1996, caving to the
            Republican Congress). Tax breaks Jenkins wants to make permanent while
            claiming that the deficit is a cause of our problem.

14 Feb - Somewhat troubling letter to the editor in Today's Leavenworth Times.
             Responding to a Matt Nowak column  from two weeks earlier (the delay is not
             necessarily the fault of the letter writer). First, the writer claims that Nowak
             did not know what he was talking about in his column, and yet the writer
             provides no examples of facts that were mistaken (or distorted). Second, the
             writer takes great umbrage at Nowak's use of the word "dittohead" but that is a
             word Rush Limbaugh coined to describe fans of his show.
                  Finally, he characterizes Nowak (and other liberals and Democrats) as people
             who "rely heavily on irrational and mean-spirited attacks". Never mind the giant
             irony of someone making such a charge in an irrational and mean-spirited
             attack. The less humorous part is people unwilling to listen across partisan
             divides, but quite willing to demonize the other side. In my experience, the
             internet fosters these kinds of divisions and hostile feelings. The feeling that
             the other side is not just wrong, or misinformed (and stubborn about it), but
             evil.

16 Feb - All three Kansas Republicans vote against delaying the transition to digital TV.
             I am not sure why that would be a partisan issue. I also don't have a converter
             box and just got rid of cable.

24 Feb - Obama gives a speech to Congress outlining our problems and what he plans to
             do to solve them. He said some are skeptical whether the stimulus will work and
             that he has appointed Vice President Biden to lead an oversight task force. Also
             he said that there will be no recovery without fixing the financial system, that
             the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our economy.
                  ABC news gave the Republican response to the President, featuring George
             Will saying Obama made many impossible promises. This was followed by a
             speech by Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal. Here's a response to Jindal.

27 Feb - FairTax.org has a table at the Washington Days convention. Puzzling since
             Reaganomics on steroids is not typically part of the Democratic Platform. Here
             are the Fundamentals of the UnFairTax, summary
             "1) The UnFairTax is not fair
              2) The UnFairTax is not progressive
              3) The UnFairTax increases taxes on the poor
              4) The UnFairTax is a huge tax cut for the rich
              5) The accuracy of the promoters at FairTax.org is not to be trusted"
 
              #3 may not be true any more, since the plan has apparently changed with the
              prebate being increased and the plan includes eliminating FICA taxes and not
              just income taxes. However, the information on what a $20,000 couple came
              from their site and it shows an increase. The UnFairTaxers use the travesty of
              the Bush tax cuts to argue against the income tax.  Back in 1996, those with
              incomes over $1 million paid an average rate of 30.9. Even in 2005 those making
              between $1 and 2 million paid an average rate of 24.6 in income taxes. The
              UnFairTaxers propose reducing it to less than 23%. Even from Bush, that would
              be a tax cut of $32,000 for people making $2 million. From Clinton, it would be a
              cut of $158,000. If it is revenue neutral then somebody must pay more to make
              up for those cuts to rich people.
                    The UnFairTax bill, HR 25, has 47 co-sponsors, all of them Republicans,
              including all three Kansas Republicans in the House. As Bush joked, his base is
              "the haves and the have-mores".

14 Mar - Lynn Jenkins says "During this recession, it is irresponsible for the federal
             government to increase its budget ..."  She calls for fiscal discipline. Here's
             what economist Dean Baker says about that on his blog "Beat the Press".

             "The most obvious effect of reducing the budget deficit right now would be to
             raise the unemployment rate, slow economic growth, and lower investment,
             thereby leaving a less productive economy for our children and grandchildren.
             While some deficit reduction cults may view this as a positive economic path,
             there are not many economists who would agree with this position."

             Lynn Jenkins also opposes Democratic plans to raise taxes on people with              incomes over $250,000. So to summarize, spending money on schools, roads,              health care for children, feeding hungry people, helping unemployed people,              and so on, that is bad because it increases the deficit. At the same time, over              $56 billion in tax cuts that go to people with incomes over $2,000,000 is              apparently a good way to increase the deficit.

             Senator Brownback took the same position as Jenkins on the front page of the
             Leavenworth Times of March 12. Brownback says he secured $100 million in
             funding for Kansas, but he also voted against the bill that would provide that
             funding. His own earmarks are 'worthwhile projects'. How many of the other
             earmarks would be considered worthwhile?  Either way, as Dean says above,
             being stingy with spending now will prolong and deepen the recession.

15 Mar - Dean Baker comments on the current deficit

             "Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of the budget deficit that the
              Republicans are now complaining about is directly attributable to President
              Bush's policies. The additional deficit for 2009 that is attributable to President
              Obama's efforts to fix the disastrous economy that he was handed by President
              Bush is trivial in comparison,..."

29 Mar - House and Senate pass a bi-partisan bill to increase funding for Americorps,
            providing more opportunities for volunteer service. The bill passes by 321-105 in
            the House with 70 Republicans voting for it and by 79-19 in the Senate. All 5 of
            Kansas Republicans in Congress vote against it.

1 Apr  -  Jenkins joins the GOP proposing "solutions to help Americans rebuild their
            savings". In an unprecedented move for Republicans, their plan relies on tax
            cuts, and unlike previous Republican plans, rich people get most of the tax cuts.

            The last line is an April Fools joke. It should not be a surprise that Republicans
            are proposing more tax cuts, nor that their tax cuts primarily benefit rich
            people. They propose, among other things, to raise the contribution limits on
            IRA accounts. The contribution limit is already $10,000 for a couple. In 2004,
            only  6.5% of those making less than $25,000 made a contribution to an IRA, and
            their average contribution was $1,854. Whereas 28% of those making over
            $500,000 made an IRA contribution and their average contribution was $9,241.

            They also propose "suspending the taxes on dividends until 2011." So much for
            their concern about the deficit. Currently dividends are taxed at a top rate of
            15%. According to IRS figures from 2005, 90% of taxpayers making less than
            $50,000 received no benefit from this tax cut while about $64 billion in tax cuts
            went to people with incomes over $500,000 (this includes capital gains tax cuts,
            which is another part of the Republican proposal.) This small group of people
            got 70% of the benefits.

            These are the same Republicans who reduced Obama's tax cut from $500 per
            person to $400 per person because they said they were worried about the
            deficit. Now they propose a $3 billion tax cut for people with incomes over
            $10,000,000.

21 Apr - Jenkins participates in taxpayer tea parties in Iola and Pittsburg and gets her
            facts wrong again. She writes: "In the 220 years between President George
            Washington and President George W. Bush, our nation accrued $5.8 trillion in
            public debt."

            Well, total debt in 2007 was almost $9 trillion, since something like $4 trillion is
            owed to the baby boom generation for their retirement. More noteworthy is
            that between George Washington and 1980, our nation accrued $909 billion in
            debt. Then Reagan was elected, promising tax cuts that would increase
            revenue. By 1990 our national debt had more than tripled, to $3,206 billion.

             President Clinton and the Republican Congress "only" added $1.41 trillion to the
             debt. Then JR Bush was elected, promising tax cuts that he said would use only
             1/4 of the projected surplus. In the six years between 2001 and 2007, Bush and
             the Republican Congress added almost $3.2 trillion to the debt.

             So 72% of that $9 trillion in debt comes from Presidents Reagan, Bush and JR
             Bush. Just 18 years of Reaganomics added more to the debt than WWI, WWII,
             the Great Depression, the Great Society, the Vietnam war, the Apollo project,
             the Marshall Plan, the Louisiana purchase, the Civil War and everything else
             before 1980. Isn't it time for people like Jenkins to stop promoting the policy of
             Reaganomics that got us into this mess?

28 Apr - Senator Arlen Specter switches from the Republican Party to the Democratic
            Party. Just another moderate conservative who no longer feels welcome in the
            Republican Party.

28 Apr - Still waiting to see the moderate in Congresswoman Jenkins. She joins just 77
            Republicans in voting against expansion of the COPS program. Even Tiahrt joined
            93 other Republicans voting for it, but not Jenkins.

15 June - Still waiting for the moderate Jenkins to appear. There are 178 Republicans in
              this House of Representatives. 70 of them voted for FDA regulation of tobacco.
              All three Kansas Republicans were part of the 97 voting against it. It passed
              overwhelmingly 307-97.

              Another bill that passed overwhelmingly (298-119) was the bill to create a $3500
              voucher for people who trade in used cars for more fuel efficient new cars. 59
              Republicans voted for it, but none of them from Kansas.

30 June - Apparently Jenkins is less moderate than Tiahrt and Moran. They both voted
              for the $44 billion budget for Homeland Security, and she voted against it. The
              budget passed by a vote of 389-37 and our 'moderate' was one of only 37 to
              vote against it. Republican alternatives that got voted down cut $41 million
              from the Air Marshal's budget and another one that cut $2.7 billion (or 6%) from
              the whole Department's Budget. Republican reasoning was that Homeland
              Security already got $2.7 billion in stimulus funds. However, since the economy
              is still not very strong, why vote to undo part of the stimulus?  They cannot
              claim to be worried about the deficit if they keep proposing more tax cuts
              (mostly for the wealthy. Remember they opposed the $500 tax credit and cut it
              to $400 because it went to poorer people.)

23 July - Jenkins votes to cut farm spending by 5% or $1.1 billion

2 Aug - Jenkins votes against an extra $2 billion for the Cash For Clunkers program. 77
           Republicans voted for it, including Tiahrt. Jenkins, the missing moderate, was one
           of 95 Republicans who voted against yet another bi-partisan bill that passed with
           a huge majority, 316 - 109.  Also, note the $2 billion would not add to the deficit
           because it was already part of the stimulus and was just being re-allocated.
           Republicans compare it to dropping money from planes. Except that would not
           provide jobs for auto workers and income for auto dealers, nor would it improve
           gas mileage by 9 miles per gallon (as reported by ABC News).

6 Aug - Sonia Sotomayor confirmed to the Supreme Court by a 68-31 vote. Only 9
           Republicans voted for her. How did we get so divided?  Roberts was confirmed by
           a vote of 78-22 and unlike Sotomayor, Roberts is an extremist and had very little
           experience. Sotomayor is more of a centrist and with many years of judicial
           experience. Plus she had the support of a growing voting bloc. Support for her
           should have been nearly unanimous. Consider the recent past.

           Ruth Ginsburg was confirmed by 96-3 in 1993.
           Sandra Day O'Connor was confirmed by 99-0 in the 1980s
           Breyer was confirmed by 87-9 in 1994
           Souter was confirmed by 90-9 in 1990
           Kennedy was confirmed by 97-0 in 1988
           Scalia was confirmed by 98-0 in 1986
           Stevens was confirmed by 99-0 in 1975

           Seems like we used to be more united, but Republican leadership is determined
           to be divisive. Is that what their supporters want?  I hope not. The first, and
           greatest Republican President gave his 'last full measure of devotion' to keep our
           country a UNITED States of America, and so did two of my great-great-
           grandfathers. Now the party of Lincoln seems determined to divide us. Kudos to
           the 9 Republicans, including Missouri's Kit Bond and shame on the others,
           including Roberts and Brownback.

6 Aug - Senate votes to extend Cash For Clunkers program. Vote is 60-37 with Roberts  
           voting against it and Brownback voting for it.


13 Aug - I attended a townhall in Oskaloosa along with over 60 others.  Congresswoman
            Jenkins said she has embraced the 'No" label and was applauded for voting no.
            Most people in the crowd seemed to be over age 60. A few Democrats spoke in
            support of health care reform and said that Medicare and Tri-Care were good 
            programs.

            Some of the Republicans there were concerned that Jenkins had voted against
            the Pence amendment. She was only one of 9 Republicans to do so.

            Jenkins closed by saying that her top 3 priorities were deficits, spending and
            deficits. However, if deficits are such a big concern, wouldn't it make sense to
            increase taxes on those making over $250,000 a year?  Instead Jenkins complains
            that Health Care Reform means "record high taxes for Small Businesses". So
            typical of a dishonest politician she writes that "the TOP small business and
            individual tax rate ... will be 53.09%". I emphasize the word TOP in her statement.

            The fact that the TOP rate does not kick in until you make more than $357,700
            means that it is not relevant to most small businesses. Less than 2% of
            households make more than $250,000 so the vast majority of us are not paying
            the top rate. It is time for politicians like Jenkins to stop pretending that an
            increase in taxes for the richest 2% means a tax increase for all of us. She
            cannot fool all of the people all of the time.

3 Sep -  Lynn Jenkins held a townhall meeting in Leavenworth at the Riverfront
            Community Center.  About 115 people attended, with some standing in the
            back and some empty chairs in the middle. She gave pretty much the same
            stump speech that she gave in Oskaloosa, although it seemed a little longer
            and included a bit about Fort Leavenworth and Gitmo. Once again, she said
            she has embraced the label of 'saying no' as if that is something to be proud
            of, and said that she has been saying yes to Republican alternatives.
 
            That's fine, except for two points. First, that the Republican alternatives are
            usually worse than the Democratic ones. On the stimulus bill, for example.
            Jenkins complained that not enough of the bill that passed was infrastructure
            spending. Well, that was because of Republicans. They wanted less spending
            and more tax cuts, and Democrats compromised, cutting the infrastructure
            spending and including more tax cuts. But Republicans still did not vote for
            it.  As discussed here in January and February their alternative provided
            more benefits for wealthier households and was less effective as a stimulus.
 
           The second point is the matter of compromise. A bill usually has ten or more   
            parts to it. Instead of wasting time offering a completely different Republican
            alternative which will just be voted down, why not offer a compromise
            alternative that might get bi-partisan support?  Take the original ten provisions
            and remove the one you think is the worst part and then add something else
            you think is good. Ask the Democrats to give up something and to give
            something in return for your support.
 
            Actually this is what happens in the Senate where compromise is required in
            order to break the fillibuster. The final bills are compromise versions that lots
            of Republicans are voting for. Things we all should be able to agree on, like
            healthcare for children and the budget for homeland security - that passed
            with only 37 Republicans voting against it. One of few saying no even to
            Homeland Security was Lynn Jenkins. 93 Republicans voted to expand the  
            COPS program, but Jenkins was one of the 77 who voted no.
 
            Jenkins is apparently proud of saying no even to bills that most Republicans
            supported. She said she felt she was elected to help 'change the way
            Washington does business'. How is being a hyper-partisan who refuses to find
            common ground a change?  Unlless Kansans want more gridlock, Jenkins is
            making a promise here that she has not kept.
 

3 Sep -  A couple other things from the meeting. Jenkins took eleven questions from
            the audience, some of them being as much statement as question. One
            person apparently wanted to bring back the days of Joe McCarthy which I
            always learned as one of the most shameful in our history, McCarthy finally
            being shamed by somebody who asked him sincerely 'Have you no
            decency?'  Yet the McCarthyite suggestion that Obama, who is barely to the
            left of Richard Nixon, is surrounded by communists was loudly applauded.
 
            Jenkins also held up a copy of the Constitution as her excuse for voting
            against the Pence Amendment. Yet when the 4th questioner mentioned
            Congressional pay raises, Jenkins did not seem familiar with the 27th
            Amendment, which says that Congressional pay raises can only take place
            after an election. That is, a pay raise passed in 2009 would not take effect
            until after the election of 2010. The Constitution can be found online here.

Nov. 4 - Somebody should call Ike Skelton and tell him that Kansas Citians are
             being lied to. The US Chamber of Commerce ads are very deceptive.
             They talk about "crushing new taxes, mostly on small businesses" The
             bill HR 3962 does include a 5.4% surcharge on INCOMES OVER $500,000.

             I don't really think a business can be considered 'small' if it provides its
             owner with $500,000 in income. According to IRS statistics for 2007
             there were 23 million tax filers with business income (other than
             farms). Their average net income was $12,134. Of the 16 million
             businesses that did not lose money, their average net income was
             $19,796. Most small businesses are not making $500,000.

             On the other hand, the 46,000 tax filers with incomes over $5 million
             had interest income that averaged $1,002,043 and also averaged
            $1,048,145 in dividend income and $640,413 in short term capital gains.
            They don't "work hard for the money", their money works for them.

            p.s. Skelton's office reports they are flooded with calls and that
            Skelton is voting against the bill. Apparently having lots of money to
            spend on lies is very effective.

Dec. 28 - Congresswoman Jenkins announces that she did not miss a single
               vote in 2009. She claims that she is representing her district by
               making every vote, but just voting is only half the picture.  If she is
               not voting the way Kansans want, then we would probably rather
               have her miss some votes then always be there to vote the wrong
               way. Did we want her to vote against the Farm Bill?  Against the
               budget for homeland security?
         
               It is almost tax time again, which is only fun if you are getting a
               refund. Something new this year is the "making work pay credit" on
               line 63 of the 1040. It is $400 for most working people. Jenkins voted
               against that too.


6 Aug  - Kaiser Family Foundation comparison of health care proposals

           AARP takes on health care myths

3 March - links to the text of health care bills
              House - click on the PDF of the bill that passed
              Senate




3 March - Jenkins attacks the stimulus bill. She points out that Kansas has lost
               47,100 jobs over the past year. The economic downturn has been
               worse than people, including Obama, predicted. After losing 4.39
               million jobs in 2008 (after the Republican stimulus checks of May
               2008), the economy lost another 4 million jobs in 2009. However,
               compare the last 3 months of 2008 to the last 3 months of 2009. At
               the end of 2008 the economy lost 2.18 million jobs in the last
               quarter. This was after the Bush stimulus of 2008, which was tax
               rebate checks. Compare this to the last quarter of 2009 when the
               economy only lost 106,000 jobs. Things are looking up even if
               Jenkins  does not want to admit it and would rather use the bad
               times for political purposes.
     
               Also, for all her supposed concern about  the unemployed, Jenkins
               joined 180 of her fellow Republicans to vote against extension of
               unemployment benefits. Which passed the house on 9 December of
               last year and has been delayed in the Senate by Republicans like
               Bunning.

3 March - Both Cheryl Hudspeth of Girard and Kyle Kessler of Topeka are
                mentioned as possible candidates for the 2nd district Congressional
                seat.

24 March - A health care bill is finally passed and signed. Some disgruntled
                 people respond by throwing bricks at windows of Democratic
                 Headquarters in Tuscon, Arizona; Rochester, NY; and also Wichita.
                 One quoted Goldwater saying "Extremism in defense of liberty is no
                 vice."  They might remember that Goldwater was defeated by a
                 landslide as over 61% voted against his extremism and LBJ went all
                 the way.

                 I am also reminded of a Reagan quote "Any jackass can kick down a
                 barn, it takes a carpenter to build one."  We are better off building
                 America rather than smashing things with bricks.

April 12 - Lisa Johnston announces she is running for the Senate creating
                a primary with Charles Schollenberger.

April 15 - Thomas Koch files for the 2nd district seat

April 20 - A little bit funny to watch a story on KMBC about the importance
                of the Fairfax plant and then to see an ad for Jerry Moran where
                he boasts that he voted "against every bailout". Ah well, he is
                probably not expecting to win Wyandotte county anyway. His claim
                that he voted against every stimulus is not true though. Moran
                voted for the $154 billion stimulus of Feb. 2008 (the one that
                clearly did not work) and he also voted for the Camp amendment
                to the Obama stimulus which would have replaced the Obama tax
                credit of $500 per worker with income tax cuts which would
                benefit higher income workers.

April 27 - Republican Senators continue to block debate on Wall Street
                Reform.


May 5 - State Senator David Haley announces he is running for the US Senate,
            making for a three way primary.